Sunday 12 March 2017

Facebook Deleted Her Account Only Because Of Her Name! Check Out Her Name

Facebook Deleted Her Account Only Because Of Her Name! Check Out Her Name

  A couple of days ago, we made you acquaint with Phuc Dat Bich, a 23-year old guy, whose Facebook account was blocked over and over again and the sole reason for the same was just his name. He was repeatedly thought to be a fake ID which resulted in blocking the account and therefore, he got frustrated and expressed his fury on Facebook along with a pic of his passport as an identity proof. Strange, isn’t it?



Well, if this seems strange and bizarre to you, we have brought one more case like this and now it’s a lady whose Facebook account had been disable for the same reason, i.e., her name “Isis”.
ISIS does not need any introduction, as it stands for a terrorist organization and its full form is “Islamic State of Iraq & Syria”. But not a number of people are aware of the fact that Isis is a famous Egyptian goddess too and there are many women of this name together with 396 infants born last year in the US. We really don’t need to tell how life would have been of the women named Isis just because of a terrorist organization and even though they were named after Goddess, they had to go through a lot of problems.
                      For example, Isis Anchalee who is a platform engineer complained about her Facebook account being disabled.


              However, Facebook later apologized as well as restored her page, giving the explanation of her account being flagged by a couple of users as fake. Another lady, Isis Beckwith, talks about being a victim of objectionable and unpleasant jokes. What’s more, she was even asked whether she ever considered name changing

Thursday 9 March 2017

MOTO G5 and nokia 3310 pre orders on flipkart




whatsapp is going to be banned

so is whatsapp going to be banned:





In the wake of their implementing 256-bit end-to-end encryption, the government--along with everyone else--is effectively locked out of end-user WhatsApp communications.

                                                                                           WhatsApp--virtually every smartphone users’ go-to app for text (and in many cases voice) messaging. According to parent company Facebook, the popular messaging app crossed 70 million monthly active users in India in October 2014, and this number is growing steadily since.
                                              So when they recently made their big announcement of enabling end-to-end encryption for all of their users, it was a big deal indeed. From the end-user perspective it’s win-win--all text and voice chats, as well as file transfers are now 256-bit encrypted, where only the sending and receiving party will be able to view the contents of a communication. Never mind a third party, Facebook claims that with this level and method of encryption even they are not privy to these conversations.
Based on a method called the Signal Protocol (read our quick explainer here,) this level of encryption is actually very high--the kind comparable to what’s used in in top secret military communications. This being the case, it’s not such a good thing from the point of view of agencies who may require access to certain end user communications. For example, if the service is used while committing a crime or terrorist act, law and government agencies may want to delve into the preceding communications. This will now not be possible in the case of WhatsApp.
                       This case, not surprisingly, runs parallel to the San Bernardino attack with the FBI demanding Apple provide a way to decrypt the iPhone used during the shooting. On the one hand authorities maintain that they require access to personal communications in such situations, while companies such as Apple and Facebook maintain that doing so would open up a hornet’s nest of instances that would result in violations to data privacy.

So where does this leave a regular WhatsApp user?

Currently, the Indian government’s Department of Telecommunications (DoT) regulates only Internet Services Providers (ISPs,) including Reliance Communications, Airtel and a host of other private players. And these regulations are quite rigid, encompassing securing a licence, and requiring the provider to obtain a special licence when implementing on their network any encryption strength exceeding 40-bit.
In the case of WhatsApp (also Skype, Viber, Google Hangouts and the numerous other mobile communications apps in use today,) these are classified as Over The Top (OTT) services. As yet, the government does not regulate these players and does not have any specific set of requirements they are required to comply with.
In this midst of this ambiguity, WhatsApp announcing 256-bit end-to-end encryption comes at a very opportune time--where it now effectively predates any clear law on the subject. In this case, any move by the government to attempt to have these companies retract their implementation of such encryption standards would be met with great resistance.
Back in September 2015, there was a Draft National Encryption Policy proposed by the Department of Electronics and Information Technology (DeitY,) one that was quite draconian, and was swiftly shot down. But there is a law that deals with the government accessing encrypted communications.
Section 69 of the IT Act 2000 basically states that the Central Government or a State Government may have the power to monitor, decrypt or intercept information through any computer resource, in the interest of protecting the nation and investigating any legal offence. However it was later clarified (quite curiously, I might add) that WhatsApp did not fall under the purview of this law.
So whether the government now decides to leverage this particular law to implement their ability to access encrypted digital communications is unclear at this point.

The bottom line

This new and significant technology evolution--like every new and significant technology evolution--can potentially be used by good and bad elements. And if you fall among the former, using WhatsApp is perfectly legal. For now.
And if there ever is a change in this status quo--as there has been in the entire Net Neutrality debate that played out last year--we can be sure that it will be hotly debated, rallied and argued before reaching any conclusive end.

Facebook's new 'Trending Topics' update is here


  
                                                              The world's largest social network has finally settled on an effective way to list basic news stories.

Facebook deployed a revised version of its controversial "Trending Topics" feature Thursday. It now shows each user a standardized list of news stories based on an automated survey of what a diverse collection of media outlets are covering. Previously, each individual user saw a personalized list of news stories in the Trending module. 
When you log onto Facebook's desktop version, you'll see Trending stories on the right, as usual. Stories are sorted according to topic and feature headlines pulled directly from news outlets—they're not written by Facebook. Clicking into the topics shows you related media, links and This new system is designed to fight back against the rise of so-called "fake news," which has proliferated on the social network in recent months.

"Trending uses a variety of signals from News Feed, including when people report news as fake or spam, to help prevent fake news, hoaxes or spam from appearing in Trending," Will Cathcart, vice president of product management at Facebook, said in a blog post announcing the update. "Today’s update may also help prevent hoaxes and fake news from appearing in Trending because the updated system identifies groups of articles shared on Facebook instead of relying solely on mentions of a topic."
Trending, which was once staffed by human journalists, has previously surfaced a false story about former Fox News host Megyn Kelly and a news item about a man pleasuring himself with a McDonald's sandwich.
Journalists were purged from Facebook's team last year after a Gizmodo report indicated that political bias sometimes shaped which stories "trended" on the platform.
Facebook did not immediately respond to Mashable's request for comment about the update, but it'll be rolling out to your profile soon if you don't already have it.